Since the early 1970’s, the inclusion of cannabis and its byproducts in the United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs has mandated a strict prohibition on cultivation and use of the substance, which has led to a largely global practice of criminalization and imprisonment of anyone found to be in its possession. Yet recently, mostly in response to growing public health concerns, countries like Uruguay, Portugal, The Netherlands, Canada, and the United States have enacted laws which seek to decriminalize or even legalize cannabis use and possession. Yet, cannabis remains classified as a Schedule IV narcotic under the Single Convention, a categorization reserved for only the most dangerous of drugs. This article traces the history of cannabis’ inclusion in the international treaties that collectively establish the framework under which cannabis currently regulated across the globe and outlines how the cannabis policies of the aforementioned countries have been enacted in spite of those treaties. The article then analyzes proposed methods of amending the current Conventions, while ultimately suggesting a policy of renunciation and re-accession as the most suitable method for maintaining international treaty compliance in the face of a global rise in efforts to legalize and decriminalize recreational cannabis use.
High Time for a Change: How the Relationship Between Signatory Countries and the United Nations Conventions Governing Narcotic Drugs Must Adapt to Foster a Global Shift in Cannabis Law,
46 Brook. J. Int'l L.
Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol46/iss2/7
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, European Law Commons, Food and Drug Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, Rule of Law Commons, Social Welfare Law Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Transnational Law Commons