Abstract
Public accountability requires open proceedings and access to documents filed with the courts. The strong policy favoring access to judicial records creates a presumption against sealing documents without a compelling reason. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that this presumption of access arises when a proceeding relates “more than tangentially” to the merits. This is a low standard under which many types of motions qualify for the compelling reasons test. With too much litigation occurring in secret, courts can use the “more than tangential” standard proactively to keep electronic case dockets available to citizens.
Recommended Citation
Jordan Elias,
“More than Tangential”: When Does the Public Have a Right to Access Judicial Records?,
29 J. L. & Pol'y
367
(2021).
Available at:
https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp/vol29/iss2/1
Included in
Civil Procedure Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Evidence Commons, First Amendment Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Litigation Commons, Privacy Law Commons