In this symposium Essay, I apply insights from philosophy and psychology to argue that modes of achieving compliance that focus on technology undermine, and are undermined by, modes of achieving compliance that focus on culture. Insisting on both may mean succeeding at neither. How an organization resolves this apparent contradiction in program design, like the broader question of optimal corporate governance arrangements, is highly idiosyncratic. Firms should therefore be accorded maximum freedom in designing their compliance programs, rather than being forced by enforcement authorities into a set of de facto mandatory compliance structures.
Sean J. Griffith,
The Question Concerning Technology in Compliance,
11 Brook. J. Corp. Fin. & Com. L.
Available at: http://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjcfcl/vol11/iss1/2
Administrative Law Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Civil Law Commons, Computer Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, Law and Psychology Commons, Legislation Commons, Organizations Law Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons